Thursday, August 30, 2007

Photo of the Week


Wet Paint, New York City, 2006
(Click thumbnail for full image)

To view previous photos of the week, check out my flickr site.

I am heading out for a little vacation and will resume postings the week of Sept 10th.

Let me get back to you.

Posted by Dan Greenfield at 08:24:03 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

Monday, August 27, 2007

The Technology of Irreverence

The announced cancellation of Fox’s The Half Hour News Hour and Presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s back and forth with a YouTube Snowman video shown during a Democratic debate makes me wonder if conservatives have a sense of humor.  Or more to the point, do they need one?

After all, for most of the past two decades, conservatives have dominated another technology – AM Radio.  As I gleaned from Wikipedia, Pew researchers found in 2004 that 17 percent of the public regularly listens to talk radio. This audience is mostly male, middle-aged and conservative. Among those who regularly listen to talk radio, 45 percent describe themselves as conservatives, compared with 18 percent who say they are liberal.  In this talk radio world, the discussion is heated, fueled by controversy and generally reflects an “angry white male” mentality. 

Attempts by liberals – most notably Air America Radio -- to challenge the likes of
Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Michael Savage have been disappointing. 

Now along comes YouTube and its irreverence.  Videos like Mentos candy exploding in Diet Coke bottles and Saturday Night Live’s Chronicles of Narnia and Lazy Sunday have caught the public's imagination.  These videos are part of an easy to use, inexpensive distribution channel that can bestow overnight celebrity status to relative unknowns.  While the quality, subject matter and tone vary considerably, the most notable and most buzzworthy are often quirky, funny, and created and watched by Net savvy twenty somethings. 


Talk Radio Versus YouTube

I am not making value judgments about which technology or ideology is better, only recognizing that different technologies appeal to different constituencies and serve different needs.  Sites like YouTube are playing a greater role in political dialogue and the cultural landscape, and conservatives and liberals alike have to determine the best way to leverage them to reach the generation of Internet users born after it was invented.

It won’t be easy.  Just as liberals have needed to figure out talk radio, conservatives need to understand the power of irreverence if they want to reach the YouTube generation.  Simply put, how can you defend the status quo and make fun of it simultaneously?  Or how do you protect your brand and let others repurpose with it ala Mentos and Diet Coke?

Of course, the use of humor in politics and advertising isn’t new.  What is new is the changing role that humor plays in shaping opinions and forming loyalties.  Younger generations expect a higher degree of irreverence and informality from those in authority. And social media only fuels this expectation by redistributing authority to multiple channels and sources. Anyone can now be an expert or pundit using informality as currency.

The lesson for politicians and CEOs -- it’s not enough to embrace new technology.  Anyone can put a video on YouTube; it is equally important to understand its social context – how it is used and by whom.   

As John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid wrote in their book, The Social Life of Information:

“The rapid innovation endemic to technology can be destabilizing, even for large organizations with copious resources….For all information’s independence and extent, it is the people, in their communities, organizations, and institutions, who ultimately decide what it all means and why it matters.”

We expect our leaders to “get it.”  Humor enhances authority, but we don’t want them to be clowns.  Irreverence can enhance authority; if abused or misunderstood, it can also undermine credibility.

Whether you are presidential candidate or a company CEO, success rests on knowing when to take things seriously and when to “just lighten up slightly.”

Let me get back to you.

Technorati Tags:

Save to del.icio.us

Posted by Dan Greenfield at 00:06:36 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

Thursday, August 23, 2007

Photo of the Week

 

 
Wedding Party, Virginia, 1999
(Click on thumbnail for full image)



To see previous photos of the week, check out my flickr site.

Let me get back to you.

Posted by Dan Greenfield at 09:07:48 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

Monday, August 20, 2007

Q and A Versus Forums: Selecting a Support 2.0 Format

Clearly, the customer support model has come a long way – from one-on-one calls into a support center then to users helping themselves through a company knowledge base to today where more customers are using social networks to get their answers. 

But when it comes to social networks, what is the best format for engaging customers seeking online support?



Anyone familiar with Yahoo! Answers or Microsoft Live’s beta knows that the Q&A format is a popular tool for customers who have random questions -- from the common to the arcane and from the specialized to the non-technical.  But can it stand up to the demands of a seasoned or even a novice enterprise customer?

The simplicity of Q&A drives customers to Yahoo’s site which makes Yahoo! happy. The wide open Q&A format also gives a high degree of flexibility to customers seeking quick answers to questions posed to a larger community. 

Dell Forum

What about forums? Forums like those for Intuit and Dell are extremely useful for those who want sustained, highly focused conversations. Unlike a Q&A format that uses tagging to organize information, forums are more structured. Users need to know which forum best addresses their questions.  Sometimes it is not obvious, and other times a question can be asked in multiple forums.  For the novice, that process may be daunting at first. The challenge with Q&A is that once the question is answered, it generally disappears.  Forums are more permanent, and participants can initiate discussions and side bars that don’t require specific answers.  What forums lack in flexibility, they make up for in depth.

As one colleague put it, it is the difference between a quick answer from advice columnist Dear Abby and an extended conversation as in My Dinner with Abby. 

Choosing the right format or combination thereof for your company will depend on the purpose of the site, who your customers are, what kind of experience they want, and how much flexibility you want to provide. Regardless of the approach you take, the goals are the same – using customer engagement to reduce call center costs and build brand loyalty.

Lithium Technologies is one company with plenty of experience building communities. They have designed enterprise software platforms for companies like Salesforce.com and Dell.  And Joe Cothrel,  vice president of community management has extensive knowledge of online community dynamics.

He believes that successful communities require sufficient scale. A Q&A format requires tremendous scale, i.e. a high volume of traffic – to make the experience robust for both those who ask questions and those who answer them.   Based on Cothrel’s extensive experience, an active community generally requires 5-10 new posts per board per day. Fewer post don’t give users enough incentive to participate.

What does it take produce sufficient scale?  On average, Cothrel has found that approximately 10 percent of visitors to a site in a given month will notice an invitation to join a forum, and 10 percent of those are likely post. 

So if a site has 5,000 visitors, 500 will visit and maybe 50 will actually engage.  Is that success?  Is this company doing enough to draw customers to a site? It all depends on a company’s objectives.

Elements for Success

Regardless of your company’s online strategy, Cothrel believes the following elements must be in place to a build a successful forum.
  • A business owner who sets direction.
  • A community manager who provides planning leadership and day-to-day decision-making.
  • A moderator who sets the tone, enforces rules, and helps users.
  • Defined roles for staff and users, and software that supports those roles. 
  • A set of comprehensive user guidelines. Some rules for action when violations or other issues arise.
  • High visibility to potential users.
  • The proper structure and atmosphere to engage users.
  • A well-managed group of “superusers.”
  • Strong measurement processes focused on business value.

Companies are only beginning to understand the dynamics of online communities. We certainly can’t ignore their growing importance in attracting, engaging and retaining customers.

As John Ragsdale, director of research at the Service and Support Professionals Association wrote to me about the future of online communities:

“You have an increasing percentage of customers looking to forums to get problems solved, and more external experts offering opinions and advice in public forums.  If companies don’t act quickly to establish online communities to corral and leverage customer expertise, that expertise will just get documented in a forum not sponsored by the company, and companies will lose credibility as the experts on their own technology.”

Working with customer and employee communications as well as product managers, corporate communications can not only spread the word; they can identify pitfalls as well as incentives for employees and customers.  Through this collaboration, corporate communications can help define the strategy needed to make that community useful and sustainable. 

Let me get back to you.

Technorati Tags:

Save to del.icio.us

Posted by Dan Greenfield at 11:55:38 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

Thursday, August 16, 2007

Photo of the Week


Swings, Atlanta, 2006
(Click on thumbnail for full image)

To see previous photos of the week, check out my flickr site.

Let me get back to you.

Posted by Dan Greenfield at 07:44:10 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

Tuesday, August 14, 2007

Naked Conversations: The Next Chapter

Yesterday, I wrote about a conversation I had with Robert Scoble that looked back on the lessons from Naked Conversations.  Today, I offer up Shel Israel, the other half of the dynamic duo that co-authored the book, to get his perspective.

Dan Greenfield: What is the biggest development that you did not forsee when Naked Conversations was first published?

Shel Israel:  The number of conversational tools that would become available on the Internet.

Greenfield:
With the advent of social networks, podcasts and vlogs, are blogs yesterday's news or is corporate blogging still in its infancy?

Israel: 
There is no contest between the items in the social media toolshed. The blogging craze is subsiding and the tool’s use is normalizing, just like email did a decade ago or a hammer did when it replaced the rock as a pounding/building tool.

Greenfield: 
Is a blog still a blog if it is more video and audio than text?

Israel:  
The more ways that people can have conversations, the better off they are, business is, government is.  You seem to be focused on blogs as in some sort of competition with other tools. I am more interested in the cultural changes that happen when people have the power to talk back, when people have the ability to simply bypass organizations that want to deliver and insert messages into their foreheads. The tool is not what is important.  Someday people will look back at today’s blog and say, “how quaint” they were back at the turn of the century. They will not be replaced.  They will evolve into something much better.

Greenfield: 
What do you think about the concept of microblogging that Twitter is making more prominent?

Israel: 
One more neat conversational tool. A great many people love Twitter and other microblogs.  Businesses have a new way of distributing information to those who want it. I don’t Twitter, because it is not a tool for me. But I am a strong proponent of any conversational tool.

Greenfield: 
If you were writing Naked Conversations today, how would it be different? same?

Israel: 
The book was about Conversations. We would cover a great many more tools.  We would have new and different stories to tell. Maybe we should write a Naked Conversations Volume II.

Greenfield:  With all the changes in technology, how can communications professionals keep up?

Israel: 
They should stop trying to insert messages and just join the conversation.  I hope they start understanding the value of taking messages back to clients, rather than just trying to deliver messages from clients. And if I am allowed a little bit of my curmudgeon-side to come out. They should read my blog long before they approach me. I will have a conversation with anyone who takes he time not to waste mine.  When they don’t know who I am, what I write about, what I’m passionate about, they have shown a lack of respect for me before we even begin to speak.

Greenfield:  I think I get the message, Shel. And thanks

--------

A year ago, Naked Conversations spurred my interest in blogging.  Today, the new communications tools are very alluring.  Just yesterday, Robert was remarking on how much more proficient he was getting with video.  The pressure is on for higher production values.  But in the end, the essence is still the conversation.  I look forward to getting their Volume II...on video or at least on a podcast.

Let me get back to you.

Technorati Tags:

Save to del.icio.us

Posted by Dan Greenfield at 12:19:08 | Permanent Link | Comments (2) |

Monday, August 13, 2007

Conversion and Evangelism: Gnomedex 2007 Take-Aways

Gnomedex 2007, Photo by Dan Greenfield

This past weekend was my introduction to Gnomedex and its founder, Chris Pirillo.   I was joined by EarthLink colleagues Jerry Grasso and Dave Coustan.  It was nice to trade Atlanta’s 103 degree heat for Seattle’s cooler clime.

 

During the 3 day conference, I met some interesting folks and heard some interesting presentations.  Over at the Seattle Aquarium for a evening event, a conversation with Robert Scoble about Naked Conversations led to a discussion about – somehow appropriately – starfish as a metaphor for new media and corporate adoption.  Now the little starfish has recently gotten a lot of play due to Rod Beckström’s and Ori Brafman’s book, The Starfish and The Spider.

Where the book’s authors use the spider and starfish to look at centralized and decentralized organizations, Scoble was kicking around the image of a starfish to talk about how new media has evolved since he and Shel Israel wrote their book.  Where Naked Conversations focused on blogs, today companies need to embrace blogs as well as podcasts, vlogs, Twitter, FaceBook, etc.  Based on the starfish metaphor, two years ago, a new media starfish would have had one arm; today it has many more, representing the many tools now at our disposal.  But like the theory in Beckström’s and Ori Brafman’s book, the starfish represents decentralized knowledge and communications that still need to be distributed throughout the organization.

The challenge is helping companies manage those many arms and making sure each arm integrates with all the others. The use of social media is more than just promoting conversations; it’s about conversion – converting all possible traffic to customers via social media.  More than building a brand and generating impressions, corporate communications' function is to help with this conversion. This no easy task.  Management needs to see the utility of these tools.  It needs to see how a starfish’s arms will feed the starfish. 

Anatomically, I am not sure what part of the starfish’s body is corporate communications.  I will leave that designation to Robert, but I think he is onto something. 

So how does corporate communications get management’s buy-in?  For that, consider Guy Kawaski.

Guy presented on the first full day, mixing humility with self promotion – no easy feat.  He listed ten ways to evangelize a product.  Evangelism is key because the product will die on the vine without passion and purpose.  I would like to appropriate his ten step program and apply it to what corporate communications needs to do to get management buy-in to a social media program.


Guy Kawaski’s Ten Key Features of Product Evangelism


Make meaning -- Nike is not about two pieces of leather and a strip of rubber.

Make mantra – a mantra that explains why you exist. Don’t need a multi word statement. The mission of Wendy's Restaurants is NOT “to deliver superior quality products and service for our customers and communities through leadership, innovation and partnerships”  It should be healthy fast food.


Roll the DICEE -- (Deep – lots of power) (Intelligent – somebody was thinking) (Complete – not just the product but all the accompanying infrastructure to support it) (Elegant) (Emotive)

Niche thyself -- the ability to provide a unique product and service with accompanying value

Let a hundred flowers blossom -- Look beyond those whom you think are going to use it; reach out to those whom you hadn’t considered

Make it personal -- how does the product affect each customer?

Find the true influencer -- not always at the top or senior management

Enable a test drive -- give customers the chance to experience the product before purchase

Look for agnostics, not atheists -- Go after those who are open, not those who have already made up their minds. In political terms, focus on the “undecided,” not those committed to the other side.

Provide a slippery slope -- baby steps – don’t force wholesale change at once

(Bonus) Don’t let the bozos the grind you down -- don't be discouraged by naysayers

Though the case for social media is getting easier to make these days, there are still pockets of resistance to new business models, decentralized communication, and freedom of expression. With each step, corporate communications needs to demonstrate a reason for social media, express it in simple terms that everyone will understand. It needs to contain DICEE. It needs to serve a unique, understandable purpose and function.

As evangelists, we need to look beyond our traditional base; we may find advocates in other parts of the company and demonstrate how social media will add meaning for those who will use it. We can't assume these influencers and allies are at the top of the organization. They may be found in customer support, engineering and product development. We need to give folks the ability to test our ideas and build support by focusing on those who are open to our ideas; not those that have already made up their minds against them.  Lastly, we must provide the ability to gradually embrace social media and not let the naysayers bully or defeat us.

Change is not easy, but evangelists are not dictators or ideologues. They need to listen, adopt and respect their audience. Without this flexibility, the chances of achieving adoption and ultimately Scoble's concept of conversion is highly questionable.

Let me get back to you.

Technorati Tags:

Save to del.icio.us

Posted by Dan Greenfield at 01:09:10 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

Thursday, August 09, 2007

Photo of the Week

 
Playground, Atlanta, 2006
(Click on thumbnail for full image)

To view previous photos of the week, check out my flickr site.

Let me get back to you.

Posted by Dan Greenfield at 08:53:37 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

Monday, August 06, 2007

Customer and Corporate Communications – Case Study: Intuit

Michael Totty’s story in last week’s Wall Street Journal "Help Yourself:  Companies Try to Make the Web an Alternative to Phone Support," reinforces my notion that PR professionals can help companies use social media as an alternative or supplement for traditional call center customer support. 

The high cost of phone support is motivation alone, but using the Web is not without its challenges.     

As Michael wrote, “Search tools often don't work very well. The libraries of frequently asked questions aren't always kept current. And, as tech and other companies increasingly rely on discussion forums to handle customer queries, it isn't always easy to tell whether the people answering your question actually know what they're talking about.”  

Failure to adequately address these concerns can spill over to the web, where bloggers and disgruntled customers have very public ways to communicate their displeasure.  Their readily accessible postings provide excellent source material for the media and worse prospective customers.

Enter corporate communications.  Working with product development and customer support, we can add our knowledge of social networks and new media communications tools.  We can serve as advisors to create forums that will answer questions before high-cost phone calls are ever made to customer support.  



Meet Intuit’s Scott K. Wilder

Case studies are a valuable way to build best practices. Scott K. Wilder with Intuit’s Small Business Divisions has been cited for his work building a successful online forum for Intuit’s customers. Intuit's QuickBooks online community, for example, is very easy to use with a nice blend of employee and customer input.  Intuit's online site blends numerous forums and blogs with an extensive database of tips, widgets and reports.  Users can locate experts by geographic location and access videos and tutorials.

Dan Greenfield: How did you build a community using forums and social networks?

Scott K. Wilder:  All good things take time. So our success did not happen overnight.  Fortunately, it is in Intuit's DNA to get as close to the customer as possible. When Scott Cook founded the company, he wanted every employee to do Follow Me Homes -- which entailed following our customers from the retail store (where they bought the product) and seeing how they used it in their environment (their home or in their office). So 'Social Networking' for us is just an extension of our Follow Me Homes. Only now, we have created an environment where users can interact with others easier (vs. employees connecting with users). We were also fortunate because managing a small business is an emotional thing -- so emotional that users (small business owners seek advice of others like them -- of other Small Business owners).

Some key take aways: 

  • The company's culture is important.
  • Understanding users' pain points and the emotion around their business or service.
  • Understanding the challenges users have in their everyday life -- or in managing their business
  • Managing a Small Business, for example, is complicated. You need to deal with legal issues, accounting issues, marketing issues, etc.   

When we launched the community we started simple and let it grow organically over time, letting our users tell us how they wanted the community to grow. They told us explicitly (we have a number of user groups who tell us where to put our development dollars) and implicitly (we see certain trends and try to build forums, blogs, etc. to facilitate discussion about those trends)

G
reenfield: How do you incentivize customers to want to help others?

Wilder: We don't incentivize them. We recognize if they are part of a special group. But we do not give them any money.
We do recognize individuals who answer more posts than others, and we do have certain groups that users can become part of. For example, we have our accountant ProAdvisors and our developers. Users of both groups have a unique icon that lets users know their expertise.

Greenfield: What are the pitfalls/challenges of using social networks in this manner?

Wilder: Once word gets out that you are incentivizing users, a company could be accused of playing favorites. It also violates the Word of Mouth Association ethics that states you should not pay someone to talk about / blog about your product unless they admit to receiving compensation upfront. Imagine having a community where everyone is eligible for a bonus -- and have to share with others that they are receiving this bonus. Our goal is to focus on facilitating interaction by building a great infrastructure for users to interact.

Greenfield:  Do you have any metrics you can share that define success?

Wilder: Here's a snap shot of some of the ways we define success:

  • Growth -- increase in uniques, etc. 
  • Engagement -- frequency and recency of participation
  • Learnings -- what are we learning from our users -- we have an area of the site called We Hear You -- where we let users know which product suggestions we have used or haven't used. 
  • Costs - Cost Per Contact vsThe Call Center  

Greenfield: Any sense of the percentage of your customers that are registered to use your online forums?

Wilder: Between 5-10 percent of our customers use our QuickBooks, Quicken and Accountant communities

Greenfield:  Have you seen a decrease in calls to customer support?

Wilder: Community has had a positive impact vis a vis inbound calls. It is less expensive and users like to interact with other business owners -- someone who is like them and who has been in the trenches.

Greenfield:  What advice would you give other companies that are considering customer forums/networks?

Wilder:  Here are some concepts to think about:
 

  • There is no secret sauce -- you learn over time through trial and error.and every community is different
  • Understand the 'Broken Window' Theory --You need moderation -- if you let one bad Apple abuse another user -- then others will start abusing other users too 
  • The 3 Rs are important:: rewards (not financial), recognition and ratings 
  • Leverage learnings -- especially when it comes to product development
  • Understand your influencers-- and how they can contribute to the you community (what will get them to engage, for example)

Greenfield:  Thanks Scott: Anything else you would like to add?

Wilder: Social Networks provide a great opportunity for businesses' to facilitate interaction among their users. And to help get relevant and useful information.  And of course, Social Networks connect people of like minds. .. in our case, they help connect Small Business owners together.

It is too challenging for any company to try and answer every type of user question. For example, two people could be using the same product in different industries -- so they will probably have different questions. How a consultant uses QuickBooks is different from a company that manufactures products. The challenge for us, then, is to build a customer support team that has experts in every industry (possible) that is using our products -- in industries, such as consulting and manufacturing. 

That would require a lot of training... and truth be told... someone who works for a manufacturing company or has manufacturing experience will always know more than someone who just gets a month of training on that industry. Someone whose livelihood depends on them working in the manufacturing industry will  always know more than others (outside the manufacturing industry). 

Therefore, Social Networks provide users with a great opportunity to become an expert and to share their knowledge and experience with other users. Social networks provide a great opportunity for users to learn first hand from experts and other users like them. 

Social Networks are certainly popular. I think people should look at some of the smaller more niche social networks to see how they benefit users (Don't just look at MySpace and FaceBook). The power of small groups -- the Wisdom of Smaller Crowds increases all the time. We have small groups on our site -- some private and public -- that benefit greatly from collaborating and learning together.

-----

Intuit has used social media to develop a very robust online community.  They are a model for other companies interested in using social media to foster customer engagement and brand extension. I am currently looking at other companies that are successfully using social media to enhance customer support and who are enlisting corporate communications to assist in these efforts.  If you have examples of either, I would be interesting in hearing from you.

Let me get back to you.

Technorati Tags:

Save to del.icio.us

Posted by Dan Greenfield at 12:00:50 | Permanent Link | Comments (1) |

Thursday, August 02, 2007

Photo of the Week

 
Trees, California, 1999
(Click on thumbnail for full image)

To view previous photos of the week, check out my flickr site.

Let me get back to you.

Posted by Dan Greenfield at 00:01:50 | Permanent Link | Comments (1) |